Who are these unmasked men?

Question: Who are Martin Kramer, Daniel Pipes, Peter Berkowitz, Nile Gardiner, and Norman Podhoretz?

Answer: They are Norman Podhoretz, Martin Kramer, Daniel Pipes, Peter Berkowitz, and Nile Gardiner, respectively.

Confused? So is Newsweek, the author of this pictograph-riddle.

Newsweek, the weekly personality tabloid, recently went after presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani with disastrous results. Not only was the article — which focused on his team of experienced and highly respected conservative advisers — embarrassingly inaccurate, the magazine offered a sidebar with the pictures, names, and descriptions of the six top advisers to help its reader(s) keep track.

Except five out of six headshots are mislabled; only Robert Kasten's photo matches his name and description.


Anyone who still reads Newsweek knows by now that the magazine's writers and editors have never heard of Republicans; they have, however, heard of "neoconservatives" and have been known to appoint "neocons" sans research or contact with said "neocons".

Which makes it even less acceptable to have made such a huge mistake — if you only know one group ("neoconservatives") you should at least know that group. Newsweek admittedly knows nothing of the one thing it claims to know anything about.

Of course, the magazine's hatred of these fine people has to do with the fact that most of them are clear-thinking experts on Middle Eastern affairs. What is striking, however, is that the MSM has championed defeat in Iraq for so long, they are actually getting bored; it's time for them to defeat any prospects for peace in Israel — which is why champions of logic and reasoning like Pipes, Kramer, and Podhoretz are in their crosshairs.

Giuliani recently questioned the wisdom of establishing an independent Palestinian state when it's clear that that state would sponsor terrorism against Israel and the United States. That is a logical approach to the situation, but one that earns you the label "neoconservative" by the MSM.

As president, Giuliani would be careful not to undermine the safety and security of the United States and its important strategic and moral allies. But the MSM isn't concerned with the United States or its allies, so why would Giuliani, who is steadfast in his loyalty to Americans and our Israeli friends, appeal to Newsweek?

Newsweek is a New York-based publication, and New Yorkers are famously protective of the man whose accomplishments as mayor of NYC are still not even fully appreciated by many in the tri-state area. (He helped NJ and NYC simultaneously by catching welfare double-dippers, and his use of the trigger/broken windows crime theory to clean up some of the uncomprehendingly dirty and dangerous parts of the city was more creative and intellectually impressive than most people give him credit for.)

Yet, all it took for the MSM to turn on him completely was his brainy-yet-tough approach to brokering the Arab-Israeli conflict only in such a way that would not sign the Jewish state's death warrant.

Time Warner, Inc., is also based in New York. Yet its current events magazine TIME decided to report on the upcoming Annapolis peace parley from... Cairo. The article, titled "Can Annapolis Forge a Mideast Peace?" unsurprisingly includes exactly zero quotes or comments from Israeli sources.

What it does include, however, are 14 separate references to "Arab sources". Only three are named, and they are the peaceniks Bashar al-Assad (Syria's dictator), Ahmed Abul-Gheit (Egypt's foreign minister), and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal — and those references are either attributed to other news sources or public statements.

The only reference to Israeli points of view is the following sentence, written by the piece's author: "Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert apparently prefers a looser conference agenda, one unlikely to commit to fresh negotiations."

Some form of the word "skepticism" was used three times in the article — never in a quote.

Arab "worry" or "concern" about lack of Israeli or American effort and concessions is referenced four times, and the author, Scott MacLeod, even uses the term "separation wall" to describe the Israeli security fence.

The term "photo-op" is thrown around, as are doubts about Israel's willingness to make peace and President George W. Bush's true intentions. The author refers to Hamas as Fatah's Islamic rival, failing to note that Hamas is actually Islamist, and that Fatah is at best Islamic (clearly not secular). And MacLeod doesn't feel it necessary to challenge either the Saudi prince's implication that Israel's settlements are illegal, or the Arab self-portrait as victims should the parley fail and the region descend into violence. (When was the last time Israelis launched an intifada?)

In other words, MacLeod wrote the article not by paying attention to the news, but by looking at his MSM handbook and relying on (only!) unnamed Arab sources.

So, memo to Giuliani: If you are skeptical about the creation of a Palestinian state, the media will come after you, (A) because you're not Arab or a terrorist apologist and (B) because you and your "neoconservative" advisers only want to go after enemies who have waged war against us.

Memo to everyone: If you want to become a mainstream media darling in the the United States, start by attacking our allies.

Otherwise, Newsweek doesn't even want to know your name.

The truth will set you free

Free, that is, if you're feeling suffocated and suppressed by those who oppose our freeing of the Iraqi people and our nation building there, or those suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome.

This is a large and vocal part of the MSM and left-wing blogosphere, such as those who are attempting to strong-arm advertisers to pull their ads from FOX News simply because FOX has, through some of the most well-respected meteorologists in the world, questioned the wisdom of global warming alarmism, similar to the NY Times's and TIME Magazine's 20th century global cooling alarmism.

Or those who are advocating the return of the "Fairness Doctrine" to silence conservative talk radio.

And the list goes on. So if you are feeling suppressed by such attacks on freedom, the truth — thanks to Tony Snow — will set you free.

I recently had the privilege of attending a talk by Snow, and I can only hope such events occur with increasing frequency. The speech was long, so I will only deal with some of the statistics Snow gave us to offer readers some insight into what is actually going on in Iraq. (Disclaimer: if you are the type that cringes at any and every nugget of good news out of Iraq, you should probably stop reading.)

Digesting Snow's report was at times troubling, because it appears that some politicians are living so far from reality that they don't even bother with a timeshare on the beautiful shores of truth — they'll never visit.

Take, for example, Hillary Clinton's response to President George W. Bush's optimistic address about Iraq.

Duane Patterson, writing on Townhall.com, gave us Clinton's pithy quote:

"The surge was designed to give the Iraqi government time to take steps to ensure a political solution to the situation. It has failed to do so."

That's interesting, because none of it's true. It's also frightening, because Clinton is running for president and she clearly has no handle on such a pivotal issue.

Democrats' lapdogs over at the Daily Kos offered a piece that claimed that Bush and co. were actually attempting to fail in Iraq, and so the war has been a rousing success, because it is a failure. Were it to be a success, it would be a failure, because only failure can ensure success; failure to fail, therefore, is the only failure that could be considered failure, because we would have not succeeded... in failing.
Such is the logic over at Kos.

In any event, the figures from Central Command in Baghdad have come in, and Snow let us in on information that would make any sane American proud — essentially, how effective the surge has been.

• High profile attacks have dropped nearly 50 percent since May, to 70 a month
  
• The number of tips from Iraqi citizens has quadrupled from 6,000 a month to 24,000
• The tips have led our forces to valuable targets including weapons caches: so far this year we’ve captured more than 3,700 weapons caches. In all of last year we only captured 2,700
• We’ve also taken down dozens of senior al-Qaeda leaders, along with Sunni insurrectionists and Shi'a militia members
• We’ve increased the pace of battalion-level operations 50 percent from last year
• Sectarian murders have declined dramatically, from 1,713 in December to 626 in June
• Coalition forces are killing or capturing an average of 1,500 al-Qaeda terrorists and other enemies per month since January.

“You call that losing? You call that failure? Is this outcome bad for the [Democratic] party? Facts are curious things, aren’t they?” Snow said.

But wait, there's more! That nation building thing we mentioned? It's happening, and it's downright inspiring.

• Since the war began, the average income of Iraqis has tripled, even accounting for inflation
  
• 15 of the nation’s provinces are largely at peace
• More than 200,000 engineers are employed at more than 240 factories around the country
• The Iraqi government is working to spend $10 billion this year — one-quarter of its budget — on capital investment
• Since the surge began, in Anbar province alone we’ve spent $5.5 million on a program that has provided jobs for 18,000 people
  

Of course, the town of Ramadi is probably the most dramatic example of what our brave men and women are accomplishing in Iraq.

Ramadi has seen such improvement over the last year that officials in Iraq are rendered almost speechless at the transformation. Ramadi's strides have really picked up since the surge began. Don't forget that this town was considered by some to be the most dangerous place in Iraq.

Consider:

• A year ago, Ramadi averaged 40 attacks a day. The average today is less than one
• A year ago, Ramadi had two police stations, with 200 officers. Today, it has 30 police stations with 7,400 officers
• In three days, more than 1,200 army recruits signed up in the town
• Our ambassador, Ryan Crocker, recently went into the Ramadi marketplace without body armor. He was greeted with flowers and candy and cheers of gratitude
• Another general reported the surge led to the killing and capture of dozens of al-Qaeda leaders, the capture of dozens of weapons caches, and the destruction of terror cells throughout the country.

“So I ask you again: Is this what it means to lose? Is this a failure? How can this possibly be bad for any political party?” Snow asked again.

He was referring, among (too many) others, to House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, who told the Washington Post that he'd seen evidence of progress in Iraq, and feared that if it continues, blue dog Democrats may support the surge.
If Republicans stay more or less united on the war — the opposition to which the Democrats believe is key to their retaining a congressional majority and possibly taking back the White House — Clyburn said it would be “a real big problem for us.”

Read those words again. According to top Democrats, it is more important to the party that our forces and the Iraqi people fail; otherwise, people like Clyburn might not be famous anymore.

I'll leave you with an excerpt from a story by Der Spiegel's Ullrich Fichtner, reporting from Iraq for the German magazine.

"Ramadi is an irritating contradiction of almost everything the world thinks it knows about Iraq — it is proof that the US military is more successful than the world wants to believe. Ramadi demonstrates that large parts of Iraq — not just Anbar Province, but also many other rural areas along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers — are essentially pacified today. This is news the world doesn't hear: Ramadi, long a hotbed of unrest, a city that once formed the southwestern tip of the notorious "Sunni Triangle," is now telling a different story, a story of Americans who came here as liberators, became hated occupiers and are now the protectors of Iraqi reconstruction."

"Protectors of Iraqi reconstruction" — that's the truth, and it will set you free. Just ask the Iraqi people.

UPDATE: On this subject, you absolutely must read the Protein Wisdom's blog from Karl. It may be the single most important blog post this year. Just fantastic stuff.